Roadmap and Peacemaking
Israel and Palestine
What starts the numerous peacemaking efforts? What brings them to a halt? Are they doomed to fail because the problem is intractable? Or are some peacemaking plans simply unrealistic? With one-sided conditions and expectations?
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Status quo won't hold, warn Middle East experts | Reuters
Status quo won't hold, warn Middle East experts| Reuters

DEAD SEA, Jordan (Reuters) - Efforts to resolve the Israel-Palestinian conflict are at a dangerous standstill and in need of a rescue mission that goes beyond U.S. mediation, speakers at a Russian-sponsored debate said on Monday.

"There is no bilateral solution," said Gershon Baskin of the Israel-Palestine Center for Research and Information. "The fastest road to the next round of violence is through another failed negotiation process ... and it has zero chance."

In remarks endorsed by Palestinian and Arab participants, he said 2009 had been "a wasted year." Next year could be "ripe for peace, but also ripe for an explosion" unless the Russians, the Europeans and the United Nations stepped up their role.

Former Russian Prime Minister Evgeny Primakov warned that a "real crisis" could develop that may strengthen the position of radical elements in the Muslim world and fuel a religious war, if the international community did not intervene.

The so-called Middle East Quartet (the United States, United Nations, Russia and the European Union) had not played enough of a role, Primakov said.

It should set out a constructive foundation for a settlement and make its recommendations to the parties, and set a time-frame for a peace conference.

"FUTILE AND IN VAIN"

In a straight-talking session of Russia's Valdai Club, Israeli speakers rejected charges that Israel was putting itself above the law, relying on power to prolong its occupation of the West and Bank, and closing its eyes to the wider risks.

"If it was not for the Israel Defense Forces, with our soldiers patrolling, the West Bank would be like Gaza," said retired IDF general Jacob Amidror. Palestinians in 2006 had voted for the Islamist movement Hamas, he reminded the conference.

Hamas rejects peace with Israel and is now in control of the Israeli-blockaded Gaza Strip, pledged to continue armed struggle to liberate all Palestinian lands.

Israelis would "not be stupid enough" to come to a proposed Moscow conference "where all the participants would be against us, like they are here," Amidror added.

"And don't sell us this nonsense that all regional conflicts will be resolved" as soon as Israel signed a treaty swapping land for peace and creating a Palestinian state," he added.

Primakov said the remarks "show the very radical views against peace in Israel, and they're probably quite widespread."

But he said a Moscow conference was only conceivable once the current deadlock was broken by the Quartet's presentation of a framework for talks defining the core issues.

Speakers clashed on whether an international force could relieve Israeli security fears. ...


Forget the two-state solution -- latimes.com
Forget the two-state solution -- latimes.com

There is no longer a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Forget the endless arguments about who offered what and who spurned whom and whether the Oslo peace process died when Yasser Arafat walked away from the bargaining table or whether it was Ariel Sharon's stroll through the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem that did it in.

All that matters are the facts on the ground, of which the most important is that -- after four decades of intensive Jewish settlement in the Palestinian territories it occupied during the 1967 war -- Israel has irreversibly cemented its grip on the land on which a Palestinian state might have been created.

Sixty years after Israel was created and Palestine was destroyed, then, we are back to where we started: Two populations inhabiting one piece of land. And if the land cannot be divided, it must be shared. Equally.

This is a position, I realize, which may take many Americans by surprise. After years of pursuing a two-state solution, and feeling perhaps that the conflict had nearly been solved, it's hard to give up the idea as unworkable.

But unworkable it is. A report published last summer by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs found that almost 40% of the West Bank is now taken up by Israeli infrastructure -- roads, settlements, military bases and so on -- largely off-limits to Palestinians. Israel has methodically broken the remainder of the territory into dozens of enclaves separated from each other and the outside world by zones that it alone controls (including, at last count, 612 checkpoints and roadblocks).

Moreover, according to the report, the Jewish settler population in the occupied territories, already approaching half a million, not only continues to grow but is growing at a rate three times greater than the rate of Israel's population increase. If the current rate continues, the settler population will double to almost 1 million people in just 12 years. Many are heavily armed and ideologically driven, unlikely to walk away voluntarily from the land they have declared to be their God-given home.

These facts alone render the status of the peace process academic.
...
They may not have a choice. As Olmert himself warned recently, more Palestinians are shifting their struggle from one for an independent state to a South African-style struggle that demands equal rights for all citizens, irrespective of religion, in a single state. "That is, of course," he noted, "a much cleaner struggle, a much more popular struggle -- and ultimately a much more powerful one." ...

CAMERA: LA Times Op-Ed Calls For Dismantlement of Jewish State
CAMERA: LA Times Op-Ed Calls For Dismantlement of Jewish State

In the past, the Los Angeles Times marked Israel's birthday with an Op-Ed calling for its dismantlement via the so-called "one-state solution." The paper didn't bother to wait for the spring anniversary of the Jewish state's founding, presenting its readers yesterday with another call for a "one-state solution."Jonathan Kuttab's Dec. 20, 2009 Op-Ed ("Steps to Create Israel-Palestine"), like earlier pieces by Saree Makdisi (here and here) and Tony Judt which called for the destruction of the Jewish state, rests on a number of basic factual errors and faulty assumptions.

From the Mediterranean to the Jordan River

Kuttab, a Palestinian attorney and activist, begins by fabricating: "With Israel in total control of the territory from the Mediterranean to the Jordan River and unwilling to relinquish a significant part of the land . . . "
In fact, between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River lies the Gaza Strip which is fully under the control of Hamas—not Israel. Moreover, 40 percent of the West Bank is under the control of the Palestinian Authority. As for Israel's alleged "unwillingness to relinquish a significant part of the land," last week Ha'aretz published a detailed report and a map showing Ehud Olmert's unprecedented offer to Mahmoud Abbas. ...
...
The yellow represents the proposed Palestinian territory — 100 percent of the Gaza Strip and 93.7 percent of the West Bank. The orange represents 327 square kilometers (equivalent to 5.8 percent of the West Bank) within Israel's pre-1967 boundaries that Israel would swap in order to annex the 6.3 percent of the West Bank in which its citizens are mostly concentrated — a near 1-to-1 exchange. Blue represents the 6.3 percent of the West Bank that Olmert hoped to annex. Mahmoud Abbas, for his part, has never made any sort of offer or presented any kind of map, so we'd have to agree with Kuttab that the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip looks "less and less likely." But not for the reasons he says.
...

Monday, December 07, 2009
Haaretz Exclusive: EU draft document on division of Jerusalem - Haaretz - Israel News
Haaretz Exclusive: EU draft document on division of Jerusalem - Haaretz - Israel News

The current holder of the rotating European Union presidency, Sweden, has put together a draft document calling for the division of Jerusalem between Israel and a future Palestinian state and implying that the EU would recognize a unilateral Palestinian declaration of statehood.

Haaretz has obtained a copy of the document (below) that has sparked criticism by Israel, which claims that such a move would further harm the chances of renewing the Mideast peace process.
...
CONTINUES


Powered by Blogger